Special Offer!Pay less for your papers
Get 15% off your first order
|← Martin Luther King Junior||Fair Minimum Wage Act of 2007 →|
One similarity in the speeches of Martin Luther King Junior and Susan b Anthony is that both were criticizing the system of governance of the American government at that time. Looking at Susan’s speech, we find that she was attacking the American constitution, which by then did not allow women to participate in the voting process. She says, “We, the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquillity, provide for the common defence, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America”. This discrimination was denying a legal right of voting to women. She further quotes a section of the American constitution which stated that people of the United States had vowed to establish justice. She was arguing that women were legally part of the people whom the constitution was referring to as the beneficiaries of justice. Similarly, Martin Luther was also criticizing the American government, which, through the police force, was mistreating black Americans. Police officers mishandled blacks and roughed them up. There was discrimination even in the education sector, where Africans could not interact with the whites in the same schools. He says, “We can never be satisfied as long as the Negro is the victim of the unspeakable horrors of police brutality” (BBC News). In general, both speeches were critiques to some form of discrimination.
In both speeches, the leaders were addressing the public who were victims of discrimination. For instance, Susan was addressing women who were eagerly waiting for her after her release from jail. On the other hand, Martin Luther King junior was addressing mostly black Americans and a few whites who share similar views towards discrimination.
In conclusion, as much as there could be a difference in the speeches that the two leaders gave in terms of their level of optimism, the two were more or less similar in their quest to stop discrimination.