Special Offer!Pay less for your papers
Get 15% off your first order
|← Using Modern Drugs||Health Effects →|
Smoking poses risks to human life as it is the inhalation of passive smokers from active smokers in public places. As the society has become more aware of the dangers associated with smoking, particularly the effects of passive smoking is the same as active. , Laws should be enacted to make it an offence to smoke in public places. Smoking in public places including buildings, accommodation and transportation should be prohibited (ASH Scotland 23). Public places should be smoke free, since they include premises that are used as workplaces, or a place where the public gather for a purpose of receiving goods or services from individuals working there. It is the duty of the individuals who are concerned with the management of public places and premises to stop smokers from polluting the environment. Many efforts to limit smoking in public places have led to many debates since non smokers believe that it is their right to stay in a clean environment, whereas smokers believe that prohibiting smoking in public places limits their freedom and behavior.
The ban on smoking in public places should include tobacco, cigarettes, herbal tobacco, and cigars. These products become prohibited immediately they are lit even if they are not being smoked at the time. As noted, the clear trend is to prohibit smoking in public places. However, most smokers resent laws that they consider them infringement of their freedom and most often they argue that their right to smoke is their own freedom. Most governments have a legitimate basis, over which to restrict smoking in public places. The much the governments can tackle this issue is a political basis and not a constitutional one, since most constitutional attacks on smoking in public places have failed (ASH Scotland 34).
Prevention of smoking in the public places including the work places should be prevented, because exposure to the passive smoking is at par with other hazardous substances. It should also be regulated since most nations have introduced partial or total ban to smoking in public places (Blanpain and Anderson 27).
Smoking in public places interferes with the comfort of people that is related to the time an individual stays in the public place. From an occupational health point of view, the significance of smoking in public places, including the workplace is the exposure of the smoke to the smoker, as well as, other people within the vicinity. Problems that are associated with smoking in the public places include: illnesses such as cancer, respiratory diseases, and heart diseases. Furthermore, smoking in public is a safety hazard that has led to deadly explosions and fires places, reduced vision, as well as, lack of concentration. Smoking in work places may lead to reduced working morale that arises due to conflicts between smokers and non-smokers. Lack of concentration by the smokers and the potential source of conflicts of active smokers and passive smokers in the public places are some of the crucial issues. Moreover, the economic aspect of smoking in public places is a financial burden to the low-income earners.
In conclusion, there is no satisfactory way of accepting smoking in the public places and at the same time protecting passive smokers from harmful effects of passive smoking. Even though ventilation is appropriate, it may not be technically feasible since such equipments are extremely expensive and may not be suitable for the public places. Thus, the only appropriate means to protect non-smokers from passive smoking from the public places is to implement a complete comprehensive ban on smoking in public places as well as, workplaces. Thus, laws should be put in place to protect the general public from second hand smoking in the public places.